We saw Rowan Atkinson in a play the other week, we really only went to see the play because of him. It was called Quatermaine's Terms, and was written in the 1980's about a group of teachers at a foreign language school in the 1960's. Basically it was about the loneliness of the British due to their inability to communicate anything like feelings or emotions to other people. Rowan Atkinson played a character kind of similar to Mr Bean if you imagine Mr Bean being able to speak and having to hold down a job, with less of Mr Bean's exhuberance. It was a pretty depressing play as this Rowan Atkinson character removed himself more and more from the surrounding teachers.
Rowan Atkinson was really good in it, his character was in nearly all of the scenes so he had to be pretty good, even though he was kind of peripheral to everything. It's good to see him in something other than comedies, as he's pretty good.
Wednesday, 13 March 2013
Sunday, 10 March 2013
Brussels
![]() |
A war memorial - with surprisingly few wreaths for Armistice Day |
There did seem to be an awful lot of scouts around, all in shorts, even though it was freezing. They seemed to be on some sort of treasure hunt, and were constantly forming circles and performing weird callisthenics in the middle of them.
![]() |
The main square in Brussels, with some great, but closed, buildings |
![]() |
Another great building |
I was hoping for massive wealth in the city, since it is home to one of seats of the European Parliament, Council of the EU, the European Commission and the European Council. I'm not sure why there needs to be four different bodies, which superficially look like they would do the same thing. The public servants who work for the EU also get paid really well, it's a bit of a bone of contention at the moment, what with the austerity going around, that the EU seems a bit immune from that. Despite the public edifices, and the vast numbers of well paid EU public servants, Brussels still felt quite poor in parts. Especially around the main train station, which is pretty much universally dodgy in cities, but it felt worse than most cities. What is it about the main train station and dodgy people. Sydney has it, Paris has it, Brussels, I could go on. Though I don't think London has it. I'm not sure which station I would classify as their main one, Kings Cross, Paddington, Euston? None of those feel dodgy at all.
![]() |
The most famous resident of Brussels |
It seems that the most famous resident of Brussels is a small, 60 cm statue of a boy peeing into a fountain. He really is quite small, for something that causes such a fuss. Apparently they dress him in costumes, and he has a wardrobe of 800 outfits. Too bad when we visited his clothes were being dry cleaned. I'm not even sure what the story behind the statue is, nobody seems to know.
Sunday, 10 February 2013
Hampstead in Winter
![]() |
The street up to the heath |
The day after it had snowed all night we headed up to the Heath. I was excited because it meant we could try out our microspikes for the first time since I'd bought them at Christmas. They are like mini-crampons that you put over your boots, very easy to get on and off, it's basically just a rubber band you stretch over the boots.
They were really good, I'm so glad I got them, we were walking all over the place, and it was as if there wasn't even any snow, like you were just walking on dry dirt.
![]() |
A red-robin, posing for me |
![]() |
Don't worry, this tree had already fallen over before the snow |
![]() |
A winter wonderland |
Even the ponds were frozen in the heath, and the birds were enjoying standing on the water. I'm not sure how they manage it, as they would stand right on the edge with the water, and I really don't know how the ice was thick enough to support them.
I was hoping to see a few dogs swimming, but for once it was even too cold for them.
It was total chaos up on Parliament Hill, this is obviously the place to toboggan in London, it is a pretty perfect place for it. So it seemed that the kids had come from far and wide to partake.
![]() |
The snowy expanses of the heath |
Living here I have wondered why it feels warmer when it snows, you would think it only snows when it's really cold. But I have since learnt that warm air can hold more moisture than cold air, so when warm, moist air hits cold, dry air, the excess moisture has to be released, which it does through snowing. So the snow doesn't cause the warm air, the warm air causes the snow. I'm sure this is something school kids learn here in primary school, but growing up in the tropics, I never really needed to learn about what caused snow.
![]() |
Pandemonium on Parliament Hill |
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
In Bruges
![]() |
The canals were so pretty |
![]() |
Everywhere you looked you had to take another shot |
![]() |
There are going to be a lot of canal shots |
I would put Bruges up there with Venice or Amsterdam, not as spectacular as Venice, but definitely as pretty as Amsterdam, and more compact too, with possibly fewer tourists. And the people were so incredibly friendly, I couldn't get over that, they were like big friendly Vikings or something. In that their exterior was a little bit intimidating, but then they opened their mouths. Perhaps it's all the beer and chocolate that keeps everyone so happy. Normally in such a tourist town you would expect almost universally surly service. Everyone knows they don't rely on repeat customers, so why bother keeping anyone happy. And yet not once did it feel like that, perhaps they were still screwing us over, but the important thing is that it didn't feel like they were.
![]() |
The canals with the dozens of tour boats |
![]() |
The brick spire of the Church of Our Lady |
There aren't a heap of museums or anything to see in the town, it is pretty, and almost around every corner is another photo opportunity. But there isn't much in the way of historical or art museums. Perhaps it's a factor of them always having been mainly a merchant city. But so long as they keep serving their delicious moules-frites I don't care that they don't have any museums. That's the other thing you've got to have if you go to Belgium, the fries, holy cow, I don't know what they do, but if there is a national dish (besides chocolate) it has to be the fry. Unbelievable. You would think there can't be that much difference in fries, but lets just say I don't think McDonald's is ever going to get a strong hold in Belgium. There is a galaxy of difference between the standard Belgian fry and a Maccas one. And the mussels, oh man, so juicy and tender, and I don't even normally like mussels, but after that weekend I am a total convert.
![]() |
Canals from a boat |
![]() |
The Madonna of Bruges |
Other than the Michelangelo sculpture, there's not a lot else. They have the second tallest brick tower in the world, at 122m it's a lot of brick. They have the chocolate museum, a fries museum, a diamond museum, a lace museum, a museum on the history of artificial lighting and an archers museum. But not a lot on the history of the town, or much in the way of art. You kind of feel that the lighting museum is clutching at straws.
![]() |
The main square |
What can I say, go, but don't take too full a stomach with you, as you will be feasting all day.
Sunday, 3 February 2013
New Forest
![]() |
One of the many ponies - all fluffy in the cold weather |
![]() |
This one really wanted food, all it got from me was a pat |
![]() |
A pony being shy |
![]() |
We even got a proper sunset for once |
![]() |
The sun setting over the sea - not something I see that often |
Salisbury Cathedral - with added Magna Carta
|
After our trip to the Stones the next day we had a little more time to check out the town before having to head back to London. The most famous thing about Salisbury (apart from Stonehenge obviously) is the cathedral and the copy of the Magna Carta it contains. This version is one of the four remaining ones written in 1215, and is the best preserved. And it really is very well preserved, it looks like it was written yesterday, there's not even much of that tea staining effect you get in old documents.
I love me some cloisters
|
He also pointed out where the local "eccentric" lives. She is a Dame or something and keeps camels. In the nativity play one year, she decided she wanted to have her camel walk down the aisle as well, and since she is the local aristocracy she gets to do what she wants. In the end the camel got to the font in the middle of the church and decided it was a bit thirsty. It hasn't been invited back since.
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
Salisbury and Stonehenge
![]() |
The stones in the dawn light |
![]() |
Just a few of the barrows around Stonehenge, the landscape is full of earthworks |
![]() |
They are really quite big |
But we weren't here to eat, we were here to walk in the footsteps of the neolithic man. So rather early on the Sunday morning we were off through the gloom and the slight drizzle to the stones. They are set in a slightly bizarre location, really close to a rather busy road, though to be fair, the road is probably busier than usual because of the stones. Apparently they are planning on shifting the road and building a big visitor centre and things. Which perhaps makes sense. You would think Stonehenge is one of the most visited sites in the UK, and yet the visitor centre is a demountable, and the car park is tiny.
![]() |
Obligatory cheesy photo |
![]() |
The slaughter-stone and the heel stone in the distance |
There was also a group of drummers whilst we were there, that was slightly weird, but I imagine they aren't all that uncommon. So they stood around in a circle and sang for a while, then started taking photos of themselves with the stones. But our guide, Pat Shelley, was amazing. Seriously if you are ever going to visit the stones this is the guy to do it with. Not only does he know so much about the stones themselves, he also knows how it all fits into the wider landscape. Though don't go with him if you want to get all druid-y and start chanting. It seems that a lot of people in this area don't really hold with that sort of behaviour.
![]() |
From inside the circle - looks bigger from this angle |
![]() |
The big knobbly bit used to be in the ground |
We also walked along the avenue, from the river to the henge there is a bank-ditch then a wide path followed by another ditch then bank. And it appears to be the route of gentlest slope up to the stones from the river. But what is more incredible is that for most of the time the stones are hidden behind a small rise, but then when you are quite close you come round a corner and suddenly the stones just appear. It's really quite cool to walk up that way to the stones, it really feels like that is how people thousands of years ago would also have approached, but for them it would have been this real procession (not that anyone really knows).
![]() |
Stone-Age dowel |
There's also the slaughter stone, which unfortunately had nothing to do with human sacrifice, apparently there's no evidence of any sacrifices going on, which I was a bit disappointed about. It's called the slaughter stone because of the iron oxide, which makes water pooling in it look like blood. Which you can kind of see in the photo above. The thought is that the slaughter stone used to be a bit of a gateway into the sacred site. Which lines up with the Newgrange passage tomb we saw in Ireland, that definitely had a stone gate that you had to step over to get inside.
![]() |
Approaching the stones from the Avenue, they suddenly appear from behind the crest of the hill |
![]() |
Woodhenge near Durrington Wells |
What can I say, the tour was really great, and I got such a feel for the area and how much stuff was around. It was also pretty amazing to see what an effect humans can have on the landscape. If you knew where to look you could still see the evidence of the earthworks from thousands of years ago, still there. Which makes you wonder what effect all our industrialisation is having on the earth now, and how that's going to look in 6000 years time.
Saturday, 19 January 2013
Master and Margarita
We were off to another play the other day, another one at the Barbican, which is where we saw Cate Blanchett in her really weird German play. I gotta visit the Barbican more, seeing as how my work is just one block away. For one they have this art installation there at the moment, which is a room with rain constantly falling (sounds like London really). What is so cool though is that they have all these motion sensors and so while you walk around you are constantly surrounded by rain, but it never falls on you. Sounds like my kind of rain. They are also meant to have a pretty good library, full of travel guides, which means I don't have to buy one next city I visit, I only have to borrow one. Now that's a good use of a public library.
But anyway this night we were there to see the Master and Margarita, it was an adaptation of the book by Bulgakov. If you have read the book you might see that it is kind of a hard story to convert to the theatre, there is so much going on, and there's a lot of devilish action, a lot of flashbacks. It was done by Complicite, which had actually already done a sell-out run of the same show earlier in the year. When I saw they were doing another showing, I was straight on to the ticketing. Which meant we ended up with seats 4 rows from the stages. This actually turned against us, when halfway through it became a bit more like a really scary comedy show where it was almost like you were going to be forced on stage and sell your soul, either that or take off all your clothes and give them to one of the actors.
I was also interested to see how they treated the fact that in the book the Margarita of the title spends about a third of it completely naked. I was sure they wouldn't really have her completely naked, surely they would have her in a skin suit, or underpants. But no, completely nude, and I'm talking completely. And there was quite a lot of action in the second half, so she was running around, jumping on chairs, flying through the air, all in just high heels. It's very odd watching someone completely naked, whilst everyone else is fully clothed, and sitting in a theatre surrounded by a bunch of high brow types. They did have some unnecessary naked old man action in the first half to balance out the female nudity in the second half.
Another thing I noticed about this theatre troupe is that they weren't uniformly pretty, in fact very few of them were even what you would call attractive, just everyday people, or really a little strange looking, everyday people. Which I thought was kind of weird in the acting world, in that it seems that you have to be good looking to get ahead. So points for that as well.
I think if you do get a chance to see one of Complicite's productions give it a go. It really sticks with you. I really liked the book too though, so perhaps that helped. I don't think you needed to have read it to enjoy the show though, this wasn't a Harry Potter movie. I would put it up there with Cate Blanchett's Big and Small play. I think the acting was better with Cate Blanchett (no surprise there), but the ambition of this play was much greater. And the things they did with video and sound was another notch up.
It's odd to compare the shows I have seen at the Barbican with those I've seen at the National Theatre. So far at the Barbican we have seen a Japanese rendition of a Shakespeare play, Cate Blanchett, and now this. Whereas at the National Theatre we have mainly seen Irish plays set in periods where the Irish were going through a bit of a rough time. I'm not sure who decides the plays they show at the NT, but perhaps they should get out to the Barbican more?
But anyway this night we were there to see the Master and Margarita, it was an adaptation of the book by Bulgakov. If you have read the book you might see that it is kind of a hard story to convert to the theatre, there is so much going on, and there's a lot of devilish action, a lot of flashbacks. It was done by Complicite, which had actually already done a sell-out run of the same show earlier in the year. When I saw they were doing another showing, I was straight on to the ticketing. Which meant we ended up with seats 4 rows from the stages. This actually turned against us, when halfway through it became a bit more like a really scary comedy show where it was almost like you were going to be forced on stage and sell your soul, either that or take off all your clothes and give them to one of the actors.
I was also interested to see how they treated the fact that in the book the Margarita of the title spends about a third of it completely naked. I was sure they wouldn't really have her completely naked, surely they would have her in a skin suit, or underpants. But no, completely nude, and I'm talking completely. And there was quite a lot of action in the second half, so she was running around, jumping on chairs, flying through the air, all in just high heels. It's very odd watching someone completely naked, whilst everyone else is fully clothed, and sitting in a theatre surrounded by a bunch of high brow types. They did have some unnecessary naked old man action in the first half to balance out the female nudity in the second half.
Another thing I noticed about this theatre troupe is that they weren't uniformly pretty, in fact very few of them were even what you would call attractive, just everyday people, or really a little strange looking, everyday people. Which I thought was kind of weird in the acting world, in that it seems that you have to be good looking to get ahead. So points for that as well.
I think if you do get a chance to see one of Complicite's productions give it a go. It really sticks with you. I really liked the book too though, so perhaps that helped. I don't think you needed to have read it to enjoy the show though, this wasn't a Harry Potter movie. I would put it up there with Cate Blanchett's Big and Small play. I think the acting was better with Cate Blanchett (no surprise there), but the ambition of this play was much greater. And the things they did with video and sound was another notch up.
It's odd to compare the shows I have seen at the Barbican with those I've seen at the National Theatre. So far at the Barbican we have seen a Japanese rendition of a Shakespeare play, Cate Blanchett, and now this. Whereas at the National Theatre we have mainly seen Irish plays set in periods where the Irish were going through a bit of a rough time. I'm not sure who decides the plays they show at the NT, but perhaps they should get out to the Barbican more?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)